This blog has been putting forth a series of posts designed to respond to parents who have come to realize that their traumatized adoptee doesn’t respond to the parenting methods (i.e., time out, removal of privileges, grounding, and so on) that were greatly effective with their “other” children—the typical children.
Today’s post tackles why reward systems are frequently ineffective with children whose histories include abuse, neglect and abandonment. Most readers are familiar with these systems as they are put forth by mental health professionals, educators, etc., on a very frequent basis. These reward systems—star charts, flip a card to a different color system or token economies—have come to dominate the way children are managed.

Rewards come from learning and other achievements!
Previous posts offering alternative parenting approaches include the below. Over time, this collection of posts will make for a nice parenting handbook:
- Another Crazy Whopper: Understanding and Dealing with Lying – Part One and Part Two
- The “Eyes” Have It
- Shhh! Quiet Parenting Zone Ahead
- Getting Started with Quiet Parenting
- Affection is Wonderful: Will the Behaviors Ever Stop?
- Time, Energy and Priorities: Homework or Monopoly?
There are many reasons for all adults to begin to reflect on the wide-spread use of these systems. For example, as adults in the workplace, does your boss offer employee rewards on a daily or weekly basis? Certainly, there are employee acknowledgement programs. However, where I work at ABC of Ohio, the boss, Dr. Keck, doesn’t have a chart hanging on which we all get stickers for such “normal” activities as arriving to work on time, staying in our offices as assigned, remembering our date books, returning phone calls in a timely manner and so on. These tasks are simply the responsibilities that go with the job. Completing them results in keeping my job and so, I earn my paycheck. Again, this is my responsibility as an adult. Good job performance results in an internal sense of accomplishment and self-worth that no prize or trinket can replicate.
Children are frequently rewarded for completing their “normal” responsibilities. As such, are they provided enough opportunities to gain an internal sense of self as good and successful? Further, isn’t the best reward for a child simply a happy parent or teacher?

Regarding the traumatized child he or she, in particular, is often set up to fail with star charts. How many have noticed that right before their adopted son or daughter is to earn the reward, he or she blows the system? Or, in the case the child does earn the reward, does the negative behavior resume in a day or so? The reasons for the lack of results with reward systems are:
- Children who have experienced trauma often lack cause-and-effect thinking. So, they make the same mistakes over and over. Reward systems, and most other traditional parenting methods for that matter, require the child to have cause-and-effect thinking in order to be effective. This is why the techniques work with typical children—privy to good, consistent care giving their logical thought processes developed on schedule. A behavioral chart requires the child to follow the implied logic—“If you don’t throw a fit for a week, then you get a prize” AND “If you stop fits altogether, you will get more from life AND “If you carry this over to other behaviors, life will get really good!” This set of thoughts requires a logical process the traumatized son or daughter does not have.
- Children that have histories of abuse, neglect and abandonment often have a poor sense of time. They don’t truly realize how long a week or a month is. So, they quit “behaving” because it seems as if they are never going to get the reward. Do you remember what it was like to wait for Christmas when you were a child?
- Traumatized children are often very concrete. The concrete thinker sees the world as black or white. There is no gray. There is limited or no abstract thinking. The concrete thinker views the star chart as a choice, “I can swear or I can go to McDonald’s.” Sometimes the child will choose to continue to use profanity, and other times, he will work the system and get to McDonald’s. It depends on which choice suits him at the time.
- The self-concept of children that have been beaten, raped, left by their parents, institutionalized, etc., is very poor. In fact, some feel nothing but a profound shame about themselves. Self-esteem is the collection of beliefs or feelings that we have about ourselves, or our self-perceptions. Patterns of self-esteem start very early in life. For example, when a baby or toddler reaches a milestone he experiences a sense of accomplishment that bolsters self-esteem. Simultaneously, the child—if in a healthy environment—receives praise and support from his parents. The child experiences feelings of parental love. In fact, parents are the most important influence on self-esteem (Sheslow and Taylor-Lukens, online.)

For traumatized children, parental love wasn’t available in the birth home or orphanage. Today, perhaps even long after the adoption, challenges remain a major source of frustration and anxiety, finding solutions to problems is difficult and they are plagued with negative self-thoughts—“I am stupid,” “I can’t do anything right” or “I don’t deserve a family.”
Thus, the traumatized child blows the star chart because he has no belief that he deserves a reward or because he doesn’t believe he can master the challenge it presents.
Throw away your charts and stickers! Instead go visit Parenting with Love and Logic. This parenting method’s foundation is the natural and logical consequence. For example, the natural and logical consequence of wetting the bed may be laundering the sheets or purchasing the detergent depending on the age of the child. The natural and logical consequence of eating all the cookies in the middle of the night is likely no snack for lunch the next day. The natural and logical consequence of a temper tantrum may be that Mom is just too tired to drive the car to football practice.
Natural and logical consequences allow the child to experience the outcome of his actions and this, over time, contributes to the development of logical functioning thus allowing the child’s cause-and-effect thinking to move forward. Once the child ceases negative behavior, he will develop the good feelings that come with being a responsible, caring member of the family! Self-concept is enhanced!
Parenting with Love and Logicand other books, CDs and tapes in the Love and Logic series by Foster Cline and Jim Fay makes sense, and it is fun parenting once you understand it. Having more fun is the best gift you can give any of your children and yourself!
Do you have experiences with Parenting with Love and Logic? Do you have thoughts about reward systems? Do you have questions about natural and logical consequences? Please leave a comment below—we love to hear from our blog readers!


Regarding the ‘logical’ consequence for bedwetting, I am interested to know how many children wet the bed on purpose. In so many of the cases that I have seen, the children wet the bed because of an immaturity in the development on some level. In most cases I would think a child should be consequenced for deliberate actions, and I am not sure, bedwetting, especially with these children, is deliberate. Before parents react and make a 4 year old change his sheets, I would hope that they would look at the reasons for the lack of control.
Dear Lynne,
I don’t actually think that many children wet the bed on purpose. I think there are many reasons for bedwetting (sexual abuse, small bladder, snesory problems, etc.) I also mentioned in the blog “depending on the age of the child.” I would also hope those with young children would realize that developmentally many traumatized children should not be expected to be totally potty trained until as late as 5-years-old.
But, I also don’t think there is anything wrong with the child participating in changing sheets. This can be a good habit to help the child develop because bedwetting is often a long-term issue. The matter is using the “love” and logic. That is, love and logic is about empathy more than it is about the consequence. Overall, my belief is that parenting traumatized children is about parental reactions moreso than consequences. In fact, other than natural and logical consequences, I don’t think many consequences are necessary with traumatized children.
In essence, I am supportive of a simple statement, “Oh my, you wet the bed. Let’s get these sheets changed.” No shame. No anger. Simply a natural and logical connection to the behavior. I would hope that eventually the child could learn to bring his own sheets down to the laundry in this manner. This is a nice habit that offsets hiding the sheets or lying about the bedwetting. It is these latter issues that lead wetting the bed to become a hugely conflictual matter in many families.
I am so happy you commented. I do like the opinions and ideas of the blog readers!
Sincerely,
Arleta